tests magic lantern canon 5d mark iii vs. 6d

While we do not know yet how the 6D performs, I would expect at least 1 stop, if not 2, of improvement in terms of image-noise. 1 MP difference, that is 5% more pixels for the 5D Mark II and is negligible.The more similar they are, the easier it is, so in this case you are choosing between two full-frame DSLRs with Canon EF-mount. To decide between any cameras, you have to go over the differences and give them value according to your needs. Other answers have already listed them thoroughly, so I will simply refer you to the specification comparison between the Canon EOS 6D and 5D Mark II. In general it's a newer model and whilst it is based around a 40D/50D type chassis it equals or exceeds the 5D mkII in most areas, the only reason I see to go with a 5D mkII would be cost/availability or if you strongly prefer the ergonomics of a larger body or if you wanted to shoot a lot of video with magic lantern.įinding the differences is easy. Results aren't out yet but I would imagine the 6D performs slightly better with regards to low light noise. The resolution difference of both cameras is negligible. marginally faster sync speed + pc sync port (for shooting with remote flashes).

faster max shutter speed 1/8000s vs 1/4000 (may be useful for shooting wide open in daylight).SD card slot instead of CF (users may have a preference, or a collection of cards already).slightly better screen and more recent UI.

Tests magic lantern canon 5d mark iii vs. 6d